2.5 percent raises slated for department heads - Columbia-Greene Media: News

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Stocks

2.5 percent raises slated for department heads

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, November 3, 2012 12:30 am

COLUMBIA COUNTY — Over the coming weeks, the Columbia County Board of Supervisors will be taking a closer look at proposals for a tentative 2013 budget. Among the items they will be considering is whether to give non-union employees and department heads raises of 2.5 percent to match raises expected for the county’s union employees. The non-union employees generally earn more than their union counterparts.

County Controller Ron Caponera has planned on budgeting the county’s department heads a 2.5 percent raise to keep up with the percentage raises of most of the county’s union workers, as has been the past practice of the board.

Subscription Required

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login Now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

You must login to view the full content on this page.

Thank you for reading 10 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 10 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 518-828-1616. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login Now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

  • Discuss

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

4 comments:

  • Scamper posted at 5:37 pm on Sun, Nov 4, 2012.

    Scamper Posts: 4

    I had no idea how inflated the salaries of these positions were. With the exception of a few, they are all so overpaid. Added to the base pay are the benefit packages they receive, health insurance & retirement contributions are two that are very costly to the county taxpayers. I know that the Commisioner of DSS does not have a county car, but wonder how many of them benefit from that, too. The 2.5% wage increase for union employees is contractural and cannot be re-negotiated. However, under no circumstances should those living on these salaries need any more taxpayer dollars.

     
  • neutralparty posted at 2:10 pm on Sun, Nov 4, 2012.

    neutralparty Posts: 128

    Everyone commenting should remember you get what you pay for. You Want professionals to work for minimum wage for the good of the tax payer. Blame those responsible for the lousy economy. Tired of public workers taking slack just because the paper posts their salaries. No one complains about a CEO's salary because it isn't advertised every year. Yet they do far more damage to your purse.

     
  • knitter posted at 6:23 am on Sat, Nov 3, 2012.

    knitter Posts: 4

    I am appalled that in these times of economic turmoil ANY pay raise would be discussed for public service jobs, including union jobs. There is no consideration of the hardship on the public! Whatever happened to a fair living wage? This is PUBLIC service, not private corporations making-a-profit working.

    I am totally against state set salaries unless the state hands over the money to make it so.

     
  • diogenes posted at 6:16 am on Sat, Nov 3, 2012.

    diogenes Posts: 8

    It would be interesting if the Register Star did an article on TOTAL compensation, as I think these numbers are only base pay. Not included is vehicles provided (another few thousand a year for those who get them), as well as monies received from other county sources (ie. holding more than one job, being directors, officers, committee members) not just the titles listed here.

     

Stocks